Legal intelligence for proactive client service

Help your clients hear it from you first.

Of Counsel AI tracks the legal developments that matter to your practice and helps your lawyers turn them into timely, source-backed client updates—before the questions arrive.

Primary authority Practice relevance Client-specific updates Lawyer review

The information cycle

The client should not be the one bringing the firm the news.

New authorities move quickly from official publication to alerts, trade media, industry discussion, and client inboxes. The commercial advantage comes from identifying the issue, understanding the client implications, and reaching out before the client has to ask what it means.

The problem is not a lack of information. It is the delay between legal change and useful client communication.
The ordinary cycle
  1. Primary authority
  2. Alert clutter
  3. Industry discussion
  4. Client asks
  5. Firm responds
A shorter path with Of Counsel AI
  1. Primary authority
  2. Relevant issue surfaced
  3. Update prepared and reviewed
  4. Firm reaches out

A directional comparison of paths. Actual awareness, preparation, and review timing varies.

Of Counsel AI Client Intelligence

Shorten the path from legal change to client conversation.

Of Counsel AI connects tailored legal monitoring with client-update preparation. Lawyers can see the underlying authority, understand why a development may matter, choose the relevant client or audience, and review a proposed update while the issue is still timely.

01

Detect the development

Follow the authorities, jurisdictions, and legal domains relevant to your practice or legal team.

02

Understand why it matters

See the authority, operative change, practical significance, and known limits in one reviewable record.

03

Choose the relevant client or audience

Your team selects the client, matter, or internal audience to which approved analysis should be applied.

04

Prepare a useful update

Use approved analysis, selected context, and an approved communication approach to prepare the proposed update.

05

Review and reach out

A lawyer reviews, changes, and approves the exact update before deciding whether to share it.

One authority. Two clients. Two reasons to reach out.

The same authority creates different reasons to act.

This deterministic example uses a real NRC final rule, verified publication dates, and two fictional client profiles. No live model generates the page.

Published March 30, 2026 · nuclear regulatory10 CFR Part 53 licensing framework
Lawyer review pending

Verified publication

The final rule was published March 30, 2026.

The Federal Register publication is 91 FR 15696. The rule became effective April 29, 2026. These dates describe the authority—not Of Counsel AI processing speed.

Publication and effective dates stay attached to the legal record so timing can be reviewed without implying unverified system latency.

Open NRC 2026 rule index
Example scope: publication → authority → implications → selected context → proposed updates → review → verified timingOpen the full product example

Ways to start

Start with the part of the information cycle you need to improve.

Use public legal intelligence, add tailored monitoring, or prepare client-specific updates. First Call and Practice Voice are offered through private pilots.

Public legal intelligenceAvailable

Practice Updates

See important developments and the authority behind them.

Explore source-linked legal updates by practice area. Each edition shows its authorities, coverage limits, and current review state.

  • Primary and official sources
  • Practice-area editions
  • Visible coverage limits
Read practice updates
Tailored legal monitoringPrivate pilot

First Call

Know what matters before your clients ask.

Define the legal domains, jurisdictions, and authorities your team needs to follow. First Call organizes relevant developments into a source-linked briefing for review.

  • Selected coverage profile
  • Source-linked developments
  • Explainable relevance
Explore First Call
Client-specific update preparationPrivate pilot

Practice Voice

Turn approved intelligence into a timely client update.

Your team chooses the relevant client or audience. Practice Voice uses approved analysis, selected context, and an approved communication approach to prepare a proposed update for lawyer review.

  • Lawyer-selected context
  • Approved analysis only
  • Versioned review state
Explore Practice Voice

Why Of Counsel AI

More than an alert. More focused than a drafting tool.

Alerts stop at awareness. General drafting tools begin with a prompt. Of Counsel AI is built around the work between them: determining why a legal development matters and helping the lawyer turn that intelligence into useful communication.

01

The authority stays visible

See the source, publication date, operative change, and relevant passage.

02

Practice relevance is explained

A defined coverage profile shows why a development belongs in the team’s watch.

03

Client context changes the update

Your team selects the client, matter, or internal audience and provides the context that changes the proposed update.

04

Timing stays honest

Verified authority dates are visible. Of Counsel AI does not claim an unverified processing speed.

05

Lawyer judgment controls the outcome

A proposed update remains pending until a lawyer reviews it and decides whether to share it.

Who it serves

Built for small firms and in-house legal teams.

Small firms can prepare timely client updates without a separate knowledge operation. In-house teams can turn selected legal developments into reviewed guidance for internal stakeholders.

Move quickly without giving up lawyer judgment.

What the tools do

Organize source-linked developments, support analysis, and prepare proposed updates from approved material and selected context.

What the lawyer does

Tests the authority, decides relevance, supplies context, changes the proposed update, and determines whether it should be shared.

A concrete place to begin

See how quickly your practice could move from a new development to a client update.

Choose a practice area, jurisdiction, and the part of the workflow you would use first. We will show the closest validated example without asking for confidential client information.